The cultural split is ... Social science: a cultural split

Throughout the history of the world in variousstates there was such a phenomenon as a socio-cultural (cultural) split. This concept is one of the "diseases" of society - an acute opposition between social relations and culture, its values.

An ordinary person may not notice that society,country, culture and science, as well as morality and law begin to lose touch, while he himself is a direct participant and, in some way, an "accomplice" to the development of the split.

A detailed definition of the concept. The cultural split is ...

Social science and sociology give concrete anda fairly clear answer - a split is considered the impossibility of finding a compromise in the solution of any issue, the opposition of the mentality of society to social relations.

The very word "schism" characterizes a certain gap,separation from anything, the cessation or rupture of various interrelationships. For example, a split in the Russian Orthodox Church or a political split caused by ethnic or ideological signs.

According to numerous studies, in anyA developed state may experience a cultural split. The definition of social science of this concept says that this is the pathology of civilization, which prevents the normal development of society and the proper conduct of negotiations (lack of consensus), which contributes to the destabilization of the society and the formation of conflict situations.

Signs of a cultural split

The imbalance between social relations andculture, science, education, as well as the non-acceptance by individuals of one stratum of society of other people, their opinions and thoughts - all these are direct indicators of the existence of a sociocultural split.

In addition, there are other signs of its manifestation in the state:

• The formation of constantly opposing communities (the elite against the middle class and other social strata).
• The emergence of Protestant, revolutionary organizations.
• Differentiation of people into groups: more educated, advanced, sensible (minority), and ignorant, historically behind the group (majority).

Manifestation in society

In the whole society, beginning with its individual members, a cultural split manifests itself. This is identified by:

• Social instability.
• Termination of relationships within society.
• The severance of relations between the state and the people, representatives of the spiritual elite and society, between representatives of power and the clergy.
• Intrapersonal cleavage.

These processes constantly disorganize a well-functioning system of society, and can provoke a large-scale conflict.

Factors of education

Non-observance of social laws and norms by the people,his desire to adapt to the arising contradictions, instead of completely eliminating them, provokes a cultural split. This definition, as well as those presented below, describe in detail the reason for the emergence of socio-cultural opposition.

In addition, the formation of a similar phenomenonprovoked by the inability of every individual or group of people to make and use significant innovations. That is, if in the state modernization was designated something, and some part of the people refuses to accept it, or does not understand what it is needed for, a cultural rift may arise.

This misunderstanding and unwillingness to launch innovations inhis life can be caused by a low level or complete lack of democracy in the regime of state rule. Without proper attention to the people, reporting to every stratum of the population, adjusting and changing innovations for them is not possible.

Split can be formed due to the fact thatinnovations come and are accepted only among the ruling persons or the higher strata of the population. The confrontation and dissatisfaction of other members of society associated with this will gradually grow, and with them a cultural split, when, in turn, the possibilities for its elimination will be minimized.

Another factor that provokes a cultural split,is the absence of a moral ideal in society. If such a development of such a confrontation is almost impossible, since the moral ideal, recognized by society, ensures the unity of the people.

Than dangerous

Different representatives of society, in conditionscultural split and crisis situation, in the struggle for one's own interests, victory in the discussion, winning in the conflict, can cross the invisible border when fruitful negotiations go to an endless "beating of the head against the wall." That is to the irresistible struggle of monologues, each participant of which considers himself a right fighter against evil.

Inversion logic, wrong, curves conceptsabout morality - that is what cultural split rests on. This definition means that to replace real, true human values, rules and order, absolutely opposite concepts are offered to the individual as truly true. Here, the inversion is aimed at resolving issues by emotional outbursts, negativity, directed at imaginary, unreal sources of discomfort. For example, a person is the place to try to solve the problem within himself, he begins to blame the state, power, law enforcement agencies in his own misfortunes and mistakes.

The split has a major impact onsubculture, the prerogative of which is the return to historical sources, the rejection of innovations and progress during the emergence of crisis situations. The cultural split here can provoke an attempt of one subculture to inflict an inversion strike on the opposite subculture, and therefore, to discard society in its development many years ago.

Methods of struggle

The split exists exactly as much asthere is a state itself. No matter how the society tried to stop its existence, it still remains, acquiring a gigantic size. According to research, with every century the society ceases to try to eliminate the socio-cultural split, adapting itself to it, which provokes the formation of various pseudo-teaching.